The Good Bad And The Ugly 2 Essay

The Good Bad And The Ugly 2 Essay The Good Bad And The Ugly 2 Essay Julian Meza 11/25/14 Mr.Taliancich The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly Imagine a world where everyone is entitled to their own concealed weapon with the exception of criminals, would there be total chaos or would there be order? "The only thing that stops a bad guy with a gun is a good guy with a gun." Said LaPierre, the executive vice president in the National Rifle Association, in a public speech following the elementary mass school shooting which took place in Newton, Connecticut. Due to this Generating discussions and fiery debates involving safety issues, gun control, the banning of assault weapons and sniper rifles. In this essay I will show you why everyone without criminal records should be entitled to carry concealed weapons. In doing so crime rates would dwindle. However, if one were so inclined to even mention a Bill of Rights reform needed to combat the gun control issue. The NRA, which are the most passionate and influential factor among the gun advocacy debates, chime in to deny such actions from taking place with arguments placing fault a mong the gun owners behind the trigger. Some steps have already been taken by certain states to restrict weapons such as sniper, assault rifles, and concealed carries in public that were available to the general public, along with the ban of unlicensed dealers selling unregistered weapons without federal background checks. For example, Democrat Senator Joe Manchin of West Virginia teamed up with Senator Pat. Toomey to propose an amendment which enforced gun control keeping weapons off the hands of criminals by proposing background checks and mental evaluations at every gun show and online shop, such amendment however has been turned down due to the shortage of votes and support from the state. On another note, a major contributor to the problem according to gun control activists, are the gun shows where unlicensed vendors sell their products without federal consent. Granted that many are not in support of the second amendment from being exercised freely in public, there are certainly advantages to owning a concealed weapon. In a society where crime plagues just about every city, personal safety is a luxury often sought after with the purchase and carrying of a concealed pistol, pepper spray, and tasers. These weapons of choice are often carried without the criminal’s knowledge which helps prevent the crimes from ever taking place. People who want to carry concealed weapons should be required to partake in psychological screenings for safety measures before applying for a background check. Although prerequisite screenings for mental issues would be mandatory to weed out the mentally unstable from ever purchasing a gun, there are also other factors. Evidently, there are a number of disadvantages from allowing people to own a concealed weapon. Some would argue that carrying a weapon would only increase the crime statistic giving those who carry a weapon a chance at doing wrong when given the opportunity. Consequently, the second amendment which is included in the Bill of Rights in combination with the gun pro activists, prevent such bans and gun control to take place arguing that such bans infringes the second amendment and should not be allowed. The second amendment adopted in the month of December on the 15th of the year 1791 written by the nation’s founding fathers, states that â€Å"A well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.† (Wikipedia).Though most p eople would agree on the fact that the constitution states gun ownership is to be solely for militia uses and not individual ownership protesters suggest the amendment is in need of an update to keep with current times, yet no action has been taken by authorities or the public to do so. The incident that started all of this buzz happened on December the 12th the year 2013 in Newton, Connecticut when twenty year old Adam Lanza had

Crusade

Crusade Crusade Crusade By Maeve Maddox The word crusade, used as both noun and verb, derives from a Latin verb meaning â€Å"to mark with a cross.† Middle English adopted the Old French form, croisee. When the OF spelling shifted to croisade, English speakers started spelling it that way too. Finally, in the 18th century, the spelling was Anglicized to crusade. The Crusades were European-led wars that began in the 11th century with the intention of recapturing Jerusalem and other places in the Holy Land that had been conquered by Muslims in the 7th century, seven years after the death of Muhammad. The last attempt by a European king to recover the Christian sites was in 1272. The earliest OED citation for croisade in reference to these wars is dated 1557. In the 18th century, crusade acquired a figurative meaning separate from the idea of a religious war. The noun came to mean â€Å"an aggressive movement against something perceived as a public evil.† The first documentation of this use occurs in 1786 in the writings of Thomas Jefferson: â€Å"Preach, my dear Sir, a crusade against ignorance.† For more than 200 years, crusade has served English speakers as a useful word to signify any kind of zealous support or opposition carried on in the name of the public good, for example: Rep. Claude Pepper, who crusaded for Franklin D. Roosevelts New Deal in the 1930s and was still championing the rights of the elderly a half-century later, died today at 88.   For years, I’ve been on a crusade to help people boost their productivity by strengthening their writing so they can avoid the problems that come with sending unclear messages. Klonsky is talking about the zealots, backed by multimillionaires, who are crusading against teachers unions as they claim to fight for the reform of public education. Kentucky has now, by reason of this legislation, decided to become educated - and we have embarked on a crusade for that purpose. Public School Crusaders Stake Out Rival Camps in Austin Sunday Express launches crusade for better mental health In the present political climate, the figurative use of crusade seems to be coming to an end as it joins others on the list of politically incorrect words: Campus Crusade Changes Name to Cru Ministry leaders worry that the word â€Å"crusade† has too many negative associations. President Bushs reference to a crusade against terrorism, which passed almost unnoticed by Americans, rang alarm bells in Europe.    Crusade is already coming in for criticism in some writing guides. This is from a UK university writing guide: Example 1: Crusade against crime Example 2: Campaign against crime The word ‘crusade’ has connotations of a battle and is more aggressive in tone than the word ‘campaign’. ‘Campaign’ implies a more considered approach. A style manual for Christian writers offers this advice: The terms  crusade  and crusades  are legitimate  words  in most contexts, although they should be  avoided  when used figuratively for Christian evangelism, modern military campaigns, or any effort to promote beliefs or values cross-culturally. As Western government spokesmen and journalists take care to avoid the English word crusade, the Arabic borrowing jihad comes to mind. Like crusade in English, jihad has two meanings in its language of origin: â€Å"a holy war against unbelievers† and â€Å"a struggle or effort to do good.† Here are some alternatives for politically correct writers who wish to phase out crusade in the figurative sense: crusade (noun): campaign drive push movement effort struggle offensive crusade (verb): work strive struggle fight agitate lobby champion promote Want to improve your English in five minutes a day? Get a subscription and start receiving our writing tips and exercises daily! Keep learning! Browse the Vocabulary category, check our popular posts, or choose a related post below:When to Capitalize Animal and Plant Names8 Writing Tips for BeginnersEmpathic or Empathetic?